4.7 Article

CONSTRAINING SPINNING DUST PARAMETERS WITH THE WMAP FIVE-YEAR DATA

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 699, Issue 2, Pages 1374-1388

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/699/2/1374

Keywords

diffuse radiation; dust, extinction; ISM: clouds; radiation mechanisms: non-thermal; radio continuum: ISM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We characterize spinning dust emission in the warm ionized medium (WIM) by comparing templates of Galactic dust and H alpha with the five-year maps from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP). The H alpha-correlated microwave emission deviates from the thermal bremsstrahlung (free-free) spectrum expected for ionized gas, exhibiting an additional broad bump peaked at similar to 40 GHz which provides similar to 20% of the peak intensity. We confirm that the bump is consistent with a modified Draine and Lazarian spinning dust model, though the peak frequency of the emission is somewhat lower than the 50 GHz previously claimed. This frequency shift results from systematic errors in the large-scale modes of the three-year WMAP data which have been corrected in the five-year data release. We show that the bump is not the result of errors in the H alpha template by analyzing regions of high free-free intensity, where the WMAP K-band map may be used as the free-free template. We rule out a pure free-free spectrum for the H alpha-correlated emission at high confidence: similar to 27 sigma for the nearly full-sky fit, even after marginalizing over the cosmic microwave background cross-correlation bias. We also extend the previous analysis by searching the parameter space of the Draine and Lazarian model but letting the amplitude float. The best fit for reasonable values of the characteristic electric dipole moment and density requires an amplitude factor of similar to 0.3. This suggests that small polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the WIM are depleted by a factor of similar to 3.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available