4.7 Article

INTERRUPTION OF TIDAL-DISRUPTION FLARES BY SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLE BINARIES

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 706, Issue 1, Pages L133-L137

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/706/1/L133

Keywords

accretion, accretion disks; black hole physics; galaxies: active; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: nuclei; gravitational waves

Funding

  1. NSFC [10573001]
  2. Chinese National 973 program [2007CB815405]
  3. China Scholarship Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Supermassive black hole binaries (SMBHBs) are products of galaxy mergers, and are important in testing. cold dark matter cosmology and locating gravitational-wave-radiation sources. A unique electromagnetic signature of SMBHBs in galactic nuclei is essential in identifying the binaries in observations from the IR band through optical to X-ray. Recently, the flares in optical, UV, and X-ray caused by supermassive black holes (SMBHs) tidally disrupting nearby stars have been successfully used to observationally probe single SMBHs in normal galaxies. In this Letter, we investigate the accretion of the gaseous debris of a tidally disrupted star by a SMBHB. Using both stability analysis of three-body systems and numerical scattering experiments, we show that the accretion of stellar debris gas, which initially decays with time alpha t(-5/3), would stop at a time T-tr similar or equal to eta T-b. Here, eta similar to 0.25 and T-b is the orbital period of the SMBHB. After a period of interruption, the accretion recurs discretely at time T-r similar or equal to xi T-b, where xi similar to 1. Both eta and xi sensitively depend on the orbital parameters of the tidally disrupted star at the tidal radius and the orbit eccentricity of SMBHB. The interrupted accretion of the stellar debris gas gives rise to an interrupted tidal flare, which could be used to identify SMBHBs in non-active galaxies in the upcoming transient surveys.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available