3.9 Article

Lumbar fractures in adult blunt trauma: Axial and single-slice helical abdominal and pelvic computed tomographic scans versus portable plain films

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00005373-200210000-00007

Keywords

lumbar fracture; plain films; abdominal; pelvic; computed tomographic scan; trauma; X-rays; radiographs; spine fracture

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Our hypothesis was that abdominal and pelvic computed tomographic (AP-CT) scans are equivalent to portable two-view plain films in detecting lumbar spine fractures in adults. Since many trauma patients often undergo AP-CT scanning to evaluate for possible intra-abdominal injuries, using the AP-CT scan to screen for lumbar fractures could make the trauma evaluation process more efficient. Methods. The institutional trauma registry at a Level I trauma center was used to identify all blunt lumbar fractures during a 6-year period. Medical records were reviewed. Results. A total of 7,216 adult blunt trauma patients were evaluated, and 115 patients were identified as having a lumbar fracture, for an incidence rate of 1.6%. Missed fracture rates were high for both AP-CT scans (23.2%, 13 of 56) and portable two-view films (12.7%, 14 of 110, p = 0.08). Fifty-two patients had both AP-CT scans and plain films. In this group, AP-CT scans missed 23.1% (12 of 52) of the lumbar fractures and plain films missed 15.4% (8 of 52). However, the combination of the two diagnostic methods did not miss any fractures (0 of 52). The missed fractures required surgery or brace in 50% (7 of 14) patients who had fractures missed by plain films and 46% (6 of 13) patients whose fractures were missed by AP-CT scanning. Conclusion Both AP-CT scans and plain films failed to diagnose significant lumbar fractures that required therapy. When screening for lumbar fractures, obtaining both AP-CT scans and portable two-view plain films may decrease missed lumbar fractures in blunt adult trauma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available