4.7 Article

THE BLAST SURVEY OF THE VELA MOLECULAR CLOUD: PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF THE DENSE CORES IN VELA-D

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 707, Issue 2, Pages 1836-1851

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/1836

Keywords

balloons; ISM: clouds; stars: formation; submillimeter

Funding

  1. NASA [NAG5-12785, NAG5-13301, NNGO-6GI11G]
  2. NSF Office of Polar Programs
  3. Canadian Space Agency
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
  5. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC)
  6. STFC [ST/G002711/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Balloon-borne Large-Aperture Submillimeter Telescope (BLAST) carried out a 250, 350, and 500 mu m survey of the galactic plane encompassing the Vela Molecular Ridge, with the primary goal of identifying the coldest dense cores possibly associated with the earliest stages of star formation. Here, we present the results from observations of the Vela-D region, covering about 4 deg(2), in which we find 141 BLAST cores. We exploit existing data taken with the Spitzer MIPS, IRAC, and SEST-SIMBA instruments to constrain their (single-temperature) spectral energy distributions, assuming a dust emissivity index beta = 2.0. This combination of data allows us to determine the temperature, luminosity, and mass of each BLAST core, and also enables us to separate starless from protostellar sources. We also analyze the effects that the uncertainties on the derived physical parameters of the individual sources have on the overall physical properties of starless and protostellar cores, and we find that there appear to be a smooth transition from the pre- to the protostellar phase. In particular, for protostellar cores we find a correlation between the MIPS24 flux, associated with the central protostar, and the temperature of the dust envelope. We also find that the core mass function of the Vela-D cores has a slope consistent with other similar (sub)millimeter surveys.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available