4.7 Article

COLLIMATED FAST WIND IN THE PREPLANETARY NEBULA CRL 618

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 696, Issue 2, Pages 1630-1639

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/696/2/1630

Keywords

planetary nebulae: general; stars: AGB and post-AGB; stars: mass loss; stars: winds, outflows

Funding

  1. NSC [NSC96-2112-M-001-014-MY3]
  2. NASA [NMO710840-102898, NAS5-26555]
  3. Space Telescope Science Institute [GO-10317.01]
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Collimated fast winds (CFWs) have been proposed to operate during the post asymptotic giant branch (post-AGB) evolutionary phase (and even earlier during the late AGB phase), responsible for the shaping of preplanetary nebulae (PPNs) and young planetary nebulae (PNs). This paper is a follow-up to our previous study of CFW models for the well-studied PPN CRL 618. Previously, we compared our CFW models with optical observations of CRL 618 in atomic and ionic lines and found that a CFW with a small opening angle can readily reproduce the highly collimated shape of the northwestern (W1) lobe of CRL 618 and the bowlike structure seen at its tip. In this paper, we compare our CFW models with recent observations of CRL 618 in CO J = 2-1, J = 65, and H(2) 1-0 S(1). In our models, limb-brightened shell structures are seen in CO and H(2) at low velocity (LV) arising from the shocked AGB wind in the shell, and can be identified as the LV components in the observations. However, the shell structure in CO J = 2-1 is significantly less extended than that seen in the observations. None of our models can properly reproduce the observed high-velocity (HV) molecular emission near the source along the body of the lobe. In order to reproduce the HV molecular emission in CRL 618, the CFW is required to have a different structure. One possible CFW structure is the cylindrical jet, with the fast wind material confined to a small cross section and collimated to the same direction along the outflow axis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available