4.7 Article

NO OBSERVATIONAL CONSTRAINTS FROM HYPOTHETICAL COLLISIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL DARK HALO PRIMORDIAL BLACK HOLES WITH GALACTIC OBJECTS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 705, Issue 1, Pages 659-669

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/705/1/659

Keywords

dark matter; early universe; Galaxy: abundances; gamma rays: bursts; X-rays: bursts

Funding

  1. Polish Ministry of Science [N203 0093/1466]
  2. Swedish Research Council [621-2006-3288]
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [E-3712/3-1]
  4. AUGER membership and theory grant [05 CU 5PD 1/2]
  5. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  6. Chinese Scholarship Council
  7. Research Department of Complex Interactions (Bochum)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It was suggested by several authors that hypothetical primordial black holes (PBHs) may contribute to the dark matter (DM) in our Galaxy. There are strong constraints based on the Hawking evaporation that practically exclude PBHs with masses m(pbh) similar to 10(15) to 10(16) g and smaller as significant contributors to the Galactic DM. Similarly, PBHs with masses greater than about 10(26) g are practically excluded by the gravitational lensing observation. The mass range between 10(16) g < m(pbh) < 10(26) g is unconstrained. In this paper, we examine possible observational signatures in the unexplored mass range, investigating hypothetical collisions of PBHs with main-sequence stars, red giants, white dwarfs, and neutron stars in our Galaxy. This has previously been discussed as possibly leading to an observable photon eruption due to shock production during the encounter. We find that such collisions are either too rare to be observed ( if the PBH masses are typically larger than about 10(20) g), or produce too little power to be detected ( if the masses are smaller than about 10(20) g).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available