4.7 Article

STRUCTURE AND HISTORY OF DARK MATTER HALOS PROBED WITH GRAVITATIONAL LENSING

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 695, Issue 2, Pages L125-L129

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/695/2/L125

Keywords

dark matter; galaxies: clusters: general; galaxies: halos; gravitational lensing; X-rays: galaxies: clusters

Funding

  1. Agenzia Spaziale Italiana

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We test with gravitational lensing (GL) data the dark matter (DM) halos embedding the luminous baryonic component of galaxy clusters; our benchmark is provided by their two-stage cosmogonical development that we compute with its variance, and by the related alpha-profiles we derive. The latter solve the Jeans equation for the self-gravitating, anisotropic DM equilibria, and yield the radial runs of the density rho(r) and the velocity dispersion sigma(2)(r)(r) in terms of the DM entropy K equivalent to sigma(2)(r)/rho(2/3) alpha r(alpha) highlighted by recent N-body simulations; the former constrains the slope to the narrow range alpha approximate to 1.25-1.3. These physically based alpha-profiles meet the overall requirements from GL observations, being intrinsically flatter at the center and steeper in the outskirts relative to the empirical Navarro, Frenk, & White formula. Specifically, we project them along the line of sight and compare with a recent extensive data set from strong and weak lensing observations in and around the cluster A1689. We find an optimal fit at both small and large scales in terms of a halo constituted by an early body with alpha approximate to 1.25 and by recent extensive outskirts, that make up an overall mass 10(15) M(circle dot) with a concentration parameter c approximate to 10 consistent with the variance we compute in the Lambda CDM cosmogony. The resulting structure corresponds to a potential well shallow in the outskirts as that inferred from the X rays radiated from the hot electrons and baryons constituting the intracluster plasma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available