4.7 Article

A priori Probability that Two Qubits Are Unentangled

Journal

QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSING
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages 397-408

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/A:1023421914825

Keywords

Qubits; SU(4); density matrix; Bures metric; statistical distinguishability metric; entanglement; Euler angle parameterization; negativity; concurrence; quasi-Monte Carlo; scrambled Halton sequences; numerical integration; isoperimetric inequalities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In a previous study (P. B. Slater, Eur. Phys. J. B. 17, 471 (2000)), several remarkably simple exact results were found, in certain specialized m-dimensional scenarios (m <= 4), for the a priori probability that a pair of qubits is unentangled/ separable. The measure used was the volume element of the Bures metric (identically one-fourth the statistical distinguishability [SD] metric). Here, making use of a newly-developed (Euler angle) parameterization of the 4 x 4 density matrices of Tilma, Byrd and Sudarshan, we extend the analysis to the complete 15-dimensional convex set (C) of arbitrarily paired qubits-the total SD volume of which is known to be pi(8)/1680 = pi(8)/2(4) . 3 . 5 . 7 approximate to 5.64794. Using advanced quasi-Monte Carlo procedures (scrambled Halton sequences) for numerical integration in this high-dimensional space, we approximately (5.64851) reproduce that value, while obtaining an estimate of 0.416302 for the SD volume of separable states. We conjecture that this is but an approximation to pi(6)/2310 = pi(6)/(2 . 3 . 5 . 7 . 11) approximate to 0.416186. The ratio of the two volumes, 8/11 pi(2) approximate to .0736881, would then constitute the exact Bures/SD probability of separability. The SD area of the 14-dimensional boundary of C is 142 pi(7)/12285 = 2 . 71 pi(7)/3(3) . 5 . 7 . 13 . 34.911, while we obtain a numerical estimate of 1.75414 for the SD area of the boundary of separable states.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available