4.7 Article

CONNECTING REIONIZATION TO THE LOCAL UNIVERSE

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 703, Issue 2, Pages L167-L171

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/703/2/L167

Keywords

cosmology: theory; galaxies: formation; intergalactic medium

Funding

  1. NASA ATFP [NNX08AH26G, NSF AST-0807312]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present results of combined N-body and three-dimensional reionization calculations to determine the relationship between reionization history and local environment in a volume of 1 Gpc h(-1) across and a resolution of about 1 Mpc. We achieve this by applying three-dimensional simulations of reionization, based on the extended Press-Schechter formalism, to the same initial conditions as the N-body simulations. We resolve about 2 x 106 halos of mass greater than similar to 10(12) M(circle dot) at z = 0, and determine the relationship between halo mass and reionization epoch for galaxies and clusters. For our fiducial reionization model, in which reionization begins at z similar to 15 and ends by z similar to 6, we find a strong bias for cluster-size halos to be in the regions that reionized first, at redshifts 10 < z < 15. Consequently, material in clusters was reionized within relatively small regions, on the order of a few Mpc, implying that all clusters in our calculation were reionized by their own progenitors. Milky Way mass halos were on average reionized later and by larger regions, with a distribution most similar to the global one, indicating that low-mass halos are nearly uncorrelated with reionization when only halo mass is taken as a prior. On average, most halos with mass less than 10(13) M(circle dot) were reionized internally, while almost all halos with masses greater than 10(14) M(circle dot) were reionized by their own progenitors. We briefly discuss the implications of this work in light of the missing satellites problem and how this new approach may be extended further.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available