4.7 Article

THE X-RAY POINT-SOURCE POPULATION OF NGC 1365: THE PUZZLE OF TWO HIGHLY-VARIABLE ULTRALUMINOUS X-RAY SOURCES

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 692, Issue 1, Pages 443-458

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/692/1/443

Keywords

galaxies: individual (NGC 1365); X-rays: binaries; X-rays: galaxies

Funding

  1. Bundesministerium fur Wirtschaft und Technologie/Deutsches Zentrum fur Luft-und Raumfahrt (BMWI/DLR) [FKZ 50 OX 0001]
  2. Max-Planck Society
  3. DFG [1177]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present 26 point-sources discovered with Chandra within 200 '' (approximate to 20 kpc) of the center of the barred supergiant galaxy NGC 1365. The majority of these sources are high-mass X-ray binaries, containing a neutron star or a black hole accreting from a luminous companion at a sub-Eddington rate. Using repeat Chandra and XMM-Newton, as well as optical observations, we discuss in detail the natures of two highly variable ultraluminous X-ray sources (ULXs): NGC 1365 X1, one of the most luminous ULXs known since the ROSAT era, which is X-ray variable by a factor of 30, and NGC 1365 X2, a newly discovered transient ULX, variable by a factor of > 90. Their maximum X-ray luminosities ((3-5) x 10(40) erg s(-1), measured with Chandra) and multiwavelength properties suggest the presence of more exotic objects and accretion modes: accretion onto intermediate mass black holes (IMBHs) and beamed/super-Eddington accretion onto solar-mass compact remnants. We argue that these two sources have black hole masses higher than those of the typical primaries found in X-ray binaries in our Galaxy (which have masses of < 20 M(circle dot)), with a likely black-hole mass of 40-60 M(circle dot) in the case of NGC 1365 X1 with a beamed/super-Eddington accretion mode, and a possible IMBH in the case of NGC 1365 X2 with M = 80-500 M(circle dot)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available