4.7 Article

CALCIUM ISOTOPE COMPOSITION OF METEORITES, EARTH, AND MARS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 702, Issue 1, Pages 707-715

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/702/1/707

Keywords

minor planets, asteroids; planetary systems: protoplanetary disks; solar system: formation; stars: AGB and post-AGB; supernovae: general

Funding

  1. NASA Astrobiology Institute [BioMARS NAI02-0024-0006]
  2. NSF [EAR0408521]
  3. LASER [NNH08ZCA001N]
  4. NASA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The relative abundances of calcium isotopes in the mass range 40-44 were measured in primitive and differentiated meteorites and igneous rocks from Earth and Mars in search of non-mass-dependent variations that could provide clues about early solar system processes. Most bulk samples of planetary materials have calcium isotopic compositions identical with Earth's within the current resolution of about 0.01% in Ca-40/Ca-44. Possible exceptions include carbonaceous chondrites, some ordinary chondrites, and two samples of calcium-aluminum-rich inclusions, which have small excesses of Ca-40. The samples with Ca-40 excesses are also known to have Ti-50 and Ba-135 excesses and Nd-142 and Sm-144 deficits. Collectively these data from refractory elements suggest that the planetary embryos represented by chondrites preserve isotopic heterogeneity that reflects different nucleosynthetic sources. No late admixture from a single nucleosynthetic source can explain all observations. The results are most compatible with variable proportions of material derived from Type II supernovae. The initial calcium isotope compositions of Earth and Mars are indistinguishable and similar to the Ca-40 abundance found in some chondrites and all differentiated meteorites studied. It appears that isotopic heterogeneity in calcium was still present at the completion of disk formation but was homogenized during planetary accretion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available