4.6 Article

Strongly absorbed quiescent X-ray emission from the X-ray transient XTE J0421+56 (CI Cam) observed with XMM-Newton

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 394, Issue 1, Pages 205-211

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021089

Keywords

accretion, accretion disks; stars : individual : XTE J0421+56; X-rays : general

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have observed the X-ray transient XTE J0421+56 in quiescence with XMM-Newton. The observed spectrum is highly unusual being dominated by an emission feature at similar to6.5 keV. The spectrum can be fit using a partially covered power-law and Gaussian line model, in which the emission is almost completely covered (covering fraction of 0.98(-0.06)(+0.02)) by neutral material and is strongly absorbed with an N-H of (5(-2)(+3)) x 10(23) atom cm(-2). This absorption is local and not interstellar. The Gaussian has a centroid energy of 6.4 +/- 0.1 keV, a width sigma < 0.28 keV and an equivalent width of 940(-460)(+650) eV. It can be interpreted as fluorescent emission line from iron. Using this model and assuming XTE J0421+56 is at a distance of 5 kpc, its 0.5-10 keV luminosity is 3.5 x 10(33) erg s(-1). The Optical Monitor onboard XMM-Newton indicates a V magnitude of 11.86 +/- 0.03. The spectra of X-ray transients in quiescence are normally modeled using advection dominated accretion flows, power-laws, or by the thermal emission from a neutron star surface. The strongly locally absorbed X-ray emission from XTE J0421+56 is therefore highly unusual and could result from the compact object being embedded within a dense circumstellar wind emitted from the supergiant B[ e] companion star. The uncovered and unabsorbed component observed below 5 keV could be due either to X-ray emission from the supergiant B[ e] star itself, or to the scattering of high-energy X-ray photons in a wind or ionized corona, such as observed in some low-mass X-ray binary systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available