4.7 Article

ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI IN FOUR METAL-POOR DWARF EMISSION-LINE GALAXIES

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 687, Issue 1, Pages 133-140

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/591660

Keywords

galaxies: abundances; galaxies: active; galaxies: irregular; galaxies: ISM; H II regions; ISM: kinematics and dynamics

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [AST02-05785]
  2. Frank Levinson Fund of the Silicon Valley Community Foundation
  3. National Science Foundation
  4. US Department of Energy
  5. NASA
  6. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  7. Max Planck Society
  8. Higher Education Funding Council for England

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present 3.5 m Apache Point Observatory second-epoch spectra of four low-metallicity emission-line dwarf galaxies discovered serendipitously in Data Release 5 of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) to have extraordinarily large broad H alpha luminosities, ranging from 3 x 10(41) to 2 x 10(42) erg s(-1). The oxygen abundance in these galaxies is very low, varying in the range 12 + log O/H = 7.36-7.99. Such extraordinarily high broad H alpha luminosities cannot be accounted for by massive stars at different stages of their evolution. By comparing these with the first-epoch SDSS spectra, we find that the broad H alpha luminosities have remained constant over a period of 3-7 yr, which probably excludes Type IIn supernovae as a possible mechanism of broad emission. The emission most likely comes from accretion disks around intermediate-mass black holes, with lower mass limits in the range similar to 5 x 10(5)-3 x 10(6) M-circle dot. If this is the case, these four objects form a new class of very low metallicity active galactic nuclei (AGNs) that have been elusive until now. The absence of the strong high-ionization lines [Ne v] lambda 3426 and He II lambda 4686 can be understood if the nonthermal radiation contributes less than similar to 10% of the total ionizing radiation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available