4.7 Article

THE VARIATION OF RELATIVE MAGNETIC HELICITY AROUND MAJOR FLARES

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 686, Issue 2, Pages 1397-1403

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/591117

Keywords

Sun: flares; Sun: magnetic fields

Funding

  1. NSF [ATM-0548952, AST 06-07544]
  2. NASA [NNG0-6GC81G, NNG0-6GE76G, NNH04AA16I]
  3. DOE [DE-AC02-76-CH03073]
  4. Directorate For Geosciences
  5. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [745744] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [과06A1102] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have investigated the variation of magnetic helicity over a span of several days around the times of 11 X-class flares which occurred in seven active regions (NOAA 9672, 10030, 10314, 10486, 10564, 10696, and 10720) using the magnetograms taken by the Michelson Doppler Imager (MDI) on board the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO). As a major result we found that each of these major flares was preceded by a significant helicity accumulation, (1.8-16) x 10(42) Mx(2) over a long period (0.5 to a few days). Another finding is that the helicity accumulates at a nearly constant rate, (4.5-4.8) x 10(40) Mx(2) hr(-1), and then becomes nearly constant before the flares. This led us to distinguish the helicity variation into two phases: a phase of monotonically increasing helicity and the following phase of relatively constant helicity. As expected, the amount of helicity accumulated shows a modest correlation with time-integrated soft X-ray flux during flares. However, the average helicity change rate in the first phase shows even stronger correlation with the time-integrated soft X-ray flux. We discuss the physical implications of this result and the possibility that this characteristic helicity variation pattern can be used as an early warning sign for solar eruptions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available