4.7 Article

A multicentre, randomised phase III trial comparing protracted venous infusion (PVI) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with PVI5-FU plus mitomycin C in patients with inoperable oesophago-gastric cancer

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages 1568-1575

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdf273

Keywords

5-fluorouracil; mitomycin C; oesophago-gastric cancer

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: This randomised study compared protracted venous infusion (PVI) fluorouracil (5-FU) with PVI 5-FU plus mitomycin C (MMC) in patients with advanced oesophago-gastric cancer. Patients and methods: Two hundred and fifty-four patients with adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma or undifferentiated carcinoma involving the oesophagus, oesophago-gastric junction or the stomach were randomised. The major end points were tumour response, survival, toxicity and quality of life. Results: The median age of patients treated was 72 years and the two arms were well-balanced for baseline demographic factors. The overall response rate was 16.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.5% to 22.7%] in patients treated with PVI5-FU alone compared with 19.1% (95% CI 12.0% to 26.0%) for those treated with PVI 5-FU plus MMC (P = 0.555). Median time to treatment failure was 3.9 months for PVI 5-FU and 3.8 months for PVI 5-FU plus MMC (P = 0.195). Median survival was 6.3 months for PVI 5-FU and 5.3 months for PVI 5-FU plus MMC (P = 1.0). Toxicity was mild for both treatments. Symptomatic benefit measured by improvement in pain control, weight loss, dysphagia and oesophageal reflux was observed in over 64% of patients in each arm. Quality of life scores were comparable in each arm. Conclusions: PVI 5-FU is a safe, effective form of palliation for patients with advanced oesophagogastric cancer although the addition of MMC adds little extra benefit.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available