4.7 Article

LEO V: A COMPANION OF A COMPANION OF THE MILKY WAY GALAXY?

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 686, Issue 2, Pages L83-L86

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/592962

Keywords

galaxies: dwarf; galaxies: individual (Leo); Local Group

Funding

  1. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. US Department of Energy
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  5. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  6. Max Planck Society
  7. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  8. NSF [AST 02-05790, 05-05711, 08-07498, AST 02-06081, 05-07453, 0808043]
  9. STFC [PP/E00105X/1, ST/H004157/1, ST/F001967/1, PP/C002229/1, PP/E001068/1, ST/H004165/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/E001068/1, PP/C002229/1, ST/F001967/1, PP/E00105X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0808043] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  12. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [0808043] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  13. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  14. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [807498] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the discovery of a new Milky Way satellite in the constellation Leo, identified in data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. It lies at a distance of similar to 180 kpc, and is separated by less than or similar to 3 degrees from another recent discovery, Leo IV. We present follow-up imaging from the Isaac Newton Telescope and spectroscopy from the Hectochelle fiber spectrograph at the Multiple Mirror Telescope. Leo V's heliocentric velocity is similar to 173.3 +/- 3.1 km s(-1), offset by similar to 40 km s(-1) from that of Leo IV. A simple interpretation of the kinematic data is that both objects may lie on the same stream, although the implied orbit is only modestly eccentric (e similar to 0.2)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available