4.7 Article

THE STAR FORMATION IN THE L1615/L1616 COMETARY CLOUD

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 687, Issue 2, Pages 1303-1322

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/591729

Keywords

circumstellar matter; infrared: stars; ISM: individual (L1615, L1616); stars: formation; stars: low-mass, brown dwarfs; stars: pre-main-sequence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present work aims at performing a comprehensive census and characterization of the pre-main-sequence (PMS) population in the cometary cloud L1615/L1616, in order to assess the significance of the triggered star formation scenario and investigate the impact of massive stars on its star formation history and mass spectrum. Our study is based on UBVRCIC and JHK(s) photometry, as well as optical multiobject spectroscopy. We performed a physical parameterization of the young stellar population in L1615/L1616. We identified 25 new T Tauri stars mainly projected on the dense head of the cometary cloud, almost doubling the current number of known members. We studied the spatial distribution of the cloud members as a function of the age and H alpha emission. The star formation efficiency (SFE) in the cloud is similar to 7%-8%, as expected for molecular clouds in the vicinity of OB associations. The slope of the initial mass function (IMF), in the mass range 0.1 M-circle dot <= M <= 5.5 M-circle dot, is consistent with that of other T and OB associations, providing further support of a universal IMF down to the hydrogen-burning limit, regardless of environmental conditions. The cometary appearance, as well as the high SFE, can be explained in terms of triggered star formation induced by the strong UV radiation from OB stars or supernova shock waves. The age spread and both the spatial and age distribution of the PMS objects provide strong evidence of sequential, multiple events and possibly still ongoing star formation activity in the cloud.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available