Journal
EXPERT OPINION ON INVESTIGATIONAL DRUGS
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages 1375-1386Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/13543784.11.10.1375
Keywords
cyclosporin A; head injury magnesium; neuropeptides; neuroprotection; neurotrauma; substance P
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In industrialised countries, the mean per capita incidence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) that results in a hospital presentation is 250 per 100,000. In Europe and North America alone, this translates to > 2 million TBI presentations annually. Approximately 25% of these presentations are admitted for hospitalisation. Despite the significance of these figures, there is no single interventional pharmacotherapy that has shown efficacy in the treatment of clinical TBI. This lack of efficacy in clinical trials may be due, in part, to the inherent heterogeneity of the traumatic brain injury population. However, it is the multifactorial nature of secondary injury that also poses a major hurdle, particularly for those therapies that have been designed to specifically target an individual injury factor. It is now becoming increasingly recognised that any successful TBI therapy may have to simultaneously affect multiple injury factors, somewhat analogous to other broad spectrum interventions. Recent efforts in experimental TBI have therefore focussed on developing novel pharmacotherapies that may affect multiple injury factors and thus improve the likelihood of a successful outcome. While a number of interventions are noteworthy in this regard, this review will focus on three novel compounds that show particular promise: magnesium, substance P antagonists and cyclosporin A.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available