4.7 Article

Spitzer constraints on the stellar populations of Lyα-emitting galaxies at z=3.1

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 674, Issue 1, Pages 70-74

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/524702

Keywords

cosmology : observations; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : high-redshift; galaxies : stellar content

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate the stellar populations of a sample of 162 Ly alpha-emitting galaxies (LAEs) at z = 3: 1 in the Extended Chandra Deep Field South, using deep Spitzer IRAC data available from the GOODS and SIMPLE surveys to derive reliable stellar population estimates. We divide the LAEs according to their rest-frame near-IR luminosities into IRAC-detected and IRAC-undetected samples. About 70% of the LAEs are undetected in 3.6 mu m down to m(3.6) = 25.2 AB. Stacking analysis reveals that the average stellar population of the IRAC-undetected sample has an age of similar to 200 Myr and a mass of similar to 3 x 10(8) M circle dot, consistent with the expectation that LAEs are mostly young and low-mass galaxies. On the other hand, the IRAC-detected LAEs are on average significantly older and more massive, with an average age greater than or similar to 1 Gyr and mass similar to 10(10) M circle dot. Comparing the IRAC colors and magnitudes of the LAEs to z similar to 3 Lyman break galaxies (LBGs) shows that the IRAC-detected LAEs lie at the faint blue end of the LBG color-magnitude distribution, suggesting that IRAC-detected LAEs may be the low-mass extension of the LBG population. We also present tentative evidence for a small fraction (similar to 5%) of obscured AGNs within the LAE sample. Our results suggest that LAEs posses a wide range of ages and masses. In addition, the presence of evolved stellar populations inside LAEs suggests that the Ly alpha-luminous phase of galaxies may be either a long-lasting or recurring phenomenon.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available