4.7 Article

TOWARD PLANETESIMALS: DENSE CHONDRULE CLUMPS IN THE PROTOPLANETARY NEBULA

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 687, Issue 2, Pages 1432-1447

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/591239

Keywords

accretion, accretion disks; instabilities; minor planets, asteroids; solar system: formation; turbulence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We outline a scenario that traces a direct path from freely floating nebula particles to the first 10-100 km sized bodies in the terrestrial planet region, producing planetesimals that have properties matching those of primitive meteorite parent bodies. We call this primary accretion.'' The scenario draws on elements of previous work and introduces a new critical threshold for planetesimal formation. We presume the nebula to be weakly turbulent, which leads to dense concentrations of aerodynamically size-sorted particles that have properties similar to those observed in chondrites. The fractional volume of the nebula occupied by these dense zones or clumps obeys a probability distribution as a function of their density, and the densest concentrations have particle mass densities that are 100 times that of the gas. However, even these densest clumps are prevented by gas pressure from undergoing gravitational instability in the traditional sense (on a dynamical timescale). While in this state of arrested development, they are susceptible to disruption by the ram pressure of the differentially orbiting nebula gas. However, self-gravity can preserve sufficiently large and dense clumps from ram pressure disruption, allowing their entrained particles to sediment gently but inexorably toward their centers, producing 10-100 km sandpile'' planetesimals. Localized radial pressure fluctuations in the nebula, as well as interactions between differentially moving dense clumps, will also play a role that must be accounted for in future studies. The scenario is readily extended from meteorite parent bodies to primary accretion throughout the solar system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available