4.7 Article

Metallicity and alpha-element abundance measurement in red giant stars from medium-resolution spectra

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 682, Issue 2, Pages 1217-1233

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/589627

Keywords

globular clusters : individual (M13, M15, M71, M79 NGC 2419, NGC 7006, NGC 7492); stars : abundances

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a technique that applies spectral synthesis to medium-resolution spectroscopy (MRS; R similar to 6000) in the red (6300 angstrom < lambda < 9100 angstrom) to measure [Fe/H] and [alpha/Fe] of individual red giant stars over a wide metallicity range. We apply our technique to 264 red giant stars in seven Galactic globular clusters and demonstrate that it reproduces the metallicities and alpha-enhancements derived from high-resolution spectroscopy (HRS). The MRS technique excludes the three Ca II triplet lines and instead relies on a plethora of weaker lines. Unlike empirical metallicity estimators, such as the equivalent width of the Ca II triplet, the synthetic method presented here is applicable over an arbitrarily wide metallicity range and is independent of assumptions about the alpha-enhancement. Estimates of cluster mean [Fe/H] from different HRS studies show typical scatter of similar to 0.1 dex but can be larger than 0.2 dex for metal-rich clusters. The scatter in HRS abundance estimates among individual stars in a given cluster is also comparable to 0.1 dex. By comparison, the scatter among MRS [Fe/H] estimates of individual stars in a given cluster is similar to 0.1 dex for most clusters but 0.17 dex for the most metal-rich cluster, M71 (<[Fe/H]> = - 0.8). A star-by-star comparison of HRS versus MRS [alpha/Fe] estimates indicates that the precision in [alpha/Fe](MRS) is 0.05 dex. The errors in [Fe/H](MRS) and [alpha/Fe](MRS) increase beyond 0.25 dex only below signal-to-noise ratios of 20 angstrom(-1), which is typical for existing MRS of the red giant stars in Leo I, one of the most distant Milky Way satellites (250 kpc).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available