4.5 Article

Effects of magnetic clouds on the occurrence of geomagnetic storms: The first 4 years of Wind

Journal

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2001JA000161

Keywords

magnetic cloud; geomagnetic storm; two-step storm; interplanetary magnetic field; shock; solar wind

Ask authors/readers for more resources

[1] We investigate geomagnetic activity associated with magnetic clouds as well as some aspects of the clouds' magnetic field structure (e. g., magnetic field distributions of the clouds). Thirty-four magnetic cloud events observed by Wind over the years 1995-1998 are investigated in this study. Magnetic clouds are a principal source of strong, long-lasting, interplanetary, negative B-z fields (in solar magnetospheric coordinates) and hence are a major source of geomagnetic activity (D-st < -50 nT). The region just upstream of a cloud may be a significant source of southward fields instead of, or as well as, the cloud itself. We call this upstream region a sheath'' if it is bounded by a shock (or a pressure pulse) and the cloud. This study helps to identify the major sources (regions of southward Bz following shock passages or within the magnetic clouds) that are most dominant in the generation of geomagnetic storms. It is found that a geomagnetic storm can be induced by (1) a sheath, (2) the leading (i.e., front part) region of a cloud, (3) the trailing part of a cloud, and (4) both sheath and cloud regions. (Because of this complexity a storm with a multistep main phase can occur.) The related occurrence percentages of storms were 17.6% (six events), 44.1% (15 events), 5.9% (two events), and 20.6% (seven events), and the averaged storm intensities (minimum Dst) were -60, -85, -92, and -58 nT, respectively. For the remaining four events (11.8%), there were no storms. The occurrence timing of storm intensity is highly correlated with the occurrence timing of minimum B-z (maximum VBs or epsilon) for a magnetic cloud with the field rotating from southward to northward.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available