4.7 Article

THE HIGHLY UNUSUAL CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF THE HERCULES DWARF SPHEROIDAL GALAXY

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 688, Issue 1, Pages L13-L16

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/595001

Keywords

stars: abundances; galaxies: dwarf; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: individual (Hercules); nuclear reactions, nucleosynthesis, abundances

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/E00105X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report on the abundance analysis of two red giants in the faint Hercules dwarf spheroidal (dSph) galaxy. These stars show a remarkable deficiency in the neutron-capture elements, while the hydrostatic alpha-elements (O, Mg) are strongly enhanced. Our data indicate [Ba/Fe] and [Mg/Fe] abundance ratios of less than or similar to - 2 and similar to + 0.8 dex, respectively, with essentially no detection of other n-capture elements. In contrast to the only other dSph star with similar abundance patterns, Dra 119, which has a very low metallicity at [Fe/H] = -2.95 dex, our objects, at [Fe/H] similar to -2.0 dex, are only moderately metal-poor. The measured ratio of hydrostatic/explosive alpha-elements indicates that high-mass (similar to 35 M-circle dot) Type II supernovae progenitors are the main, if not only, contributors to the enrichment of this galaxy. This suggests that star formation and chemical enrichment in the ultrafaint dSphs proceeds stochastically and inhomogeneously on small scales, or that the IMF was strongly skewed to high-mass stars. The neutron capture deficiencies and the [Co/Fe] and [Cr/Fe] abundance ratios in our stars are similar to those in the extremely low metallicity Galactic halo. This suggests that either our stars are composed mainly of the ejecta from the first, massive, Population III stars ( but at moderately high [Fe/H]), or that SN ejecta in the Hercules galaxy were diluted with similar to 30 times less hydrogen than typical for extreme metal-poor stars.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available