4.7 Article

The luminosity dependence of the galaxy merger rate

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 685, Issue 1, Pages 235-246

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/590542

Keywords

galaxies : evolution; galaxies : interactions; galaxies : statistics; surveys

Funding

  1. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  2. Participating Institutions
  3. National Science Foundation
  4. U. S. Department of Energy
  5. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  6. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  7. Max Planck Society
  8. Higher Education Funding Council for England

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We measure the number of companions per galaxy (N-c) as a function of r-band absolute magnitude for both the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and the Croton and coworkers semianalytic catalog applied to the Millennium Run simulation. For close pairs with projected separations of 5-20 h(-1) kpc, velocity differences less than 500 km s(-1), and luminosity ratios between 1: 2 and 2: 1, we find good agreement between the observations and simulations, with N-c consistently close to 0.02 over the range -22 < M-r < -18. For larger pair separations, N-c(M-r) instead becomes increasingly steep toward the faint end, implying that luminosity-dependent clustering plays an important role on small scales. Using the simulations to assess and correct for projection effects, we infer that the real-space N-c(M-r) for close pairs peaks at about M* and declines by at least a factor of 2 as M-r becomes fainter. Conversely, by measuring the number density of close companions, we estimate that at least 90% of all major mergers occur between galaxies which are fainter than L*. Finally, measurements of the luminosity density of close companions indicate that L* galaxies likely dominate in terms of the overall importance of major mergers in the evolution of galaxy populations at low redshift.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available