4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Validation of the Variational Asymptotic Beam Sectional Analysis

Journal

AIAA JOURNAL
Volume 40, Issue 10, Pages 2105-2112

Publisher

AMER INST AERONAUTICS ASTRONAUTICS
DOI: 10.2514/2.1545

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The computer program Variational Asymptotic Beam Section Analysis (VABS) uses the variational asymptotic method to split a three-dimensional nonlinear elasticity problem into a two-dimensional linear cross-sectional analysis and a one-dimensional, nonlinear beam problem. This is accomplished by taking advantage of certain small parameters inherent to beam-like structures. VABS is able to calculate the one-dimensional cross-sectional stiffness constants, with transverse shear and Vlasov refinements, for initially twisted and curved beams with arbitrary geometry and material properties. Several validation cases are presented. First, an elliptic bar is modeled with transverse shear refinement using the variational asymptotic method, and the solution is shown to be identical to that obtained from the theory of elasticity. The shear center locations calculated by VABS for various cross sections agree well with those obtained from common engineering analyses. Comparisons with other composite beam theories prove that it is unnecessary to introduce ad hoe kinematic assumptions to build an accurate beam model. For numerical validation values of the one-dimensional variables are extracted from an ABAQUS model and compared with results from a one-dimensional beam analysis using cross-sectional constants from VABS. Furthermore, point-wise three-dimensional stress and strain fields are recovered using VABS, and the correlation with the three-dimensional results from ABAQUS is excellent. Finally, classical theory is shown to be insufficient for general-purpose beam modeling. Appropriate refined theories are recommended for some classes of problems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available