Journal
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 690, Issue 2, Pages 1488-1496Publisher
IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/690/2/1488
Keywords
cosmology: theory; dark matter; galaxies: halos; galaxies: structure; methods: numerical
Categories
Funding
- NSF [AST0407072]
- Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia of Spain [PNAYA 2005-07789]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The motion of satellite galaxies around normal galaxies at distances 50-500 kpc provides a sensitive test for theories. We study the surface density and velocities of satellites around isolated red galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. We find that the surface number density of satellites declines with the projected distance as a power law with the slope -1.5 to 2. The rms velocities gradually decline: observations exclude constant velocities at a similar to 10 sigma level. We show that observational data strongly favor the standard model; all three major statistics of satellites-the number-density profile, the line-of-sight velocity dispersion, and the distribution function of the velocities-agree remarkably well with the predictions of the standard cosmological model. Thus, the success of the standard model extends to scales (50-500) kpc, much lower than what was previously considered. Modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND) fails on these scales for models which assume any single power-law number-density profile of satellites and any constant velocity anisotropy by predicting nearly constant rms velocities of satellites. Satellite data can be fit by fine-tuned models, which require (1) specific non-power-law density profile, (2) very radial orbits at large distances (velocity anisotropy beta = 0.60.7 at R = 200-300 kpc), and (3) 2-2.5 times more stellar mass than what is found in the galaxies. The external gravity force - a necessary component for MOND - makes the situation even worse. We argue that a combination of satellite data and observational constraints on stellar masses make these models very problematic.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available