4.7 Article

The oxygen abundances of luminous and ultraluminous infrared galaxies

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 674, Issue 1, Pages 172-193

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/522363

Keywords

galaxies : abundances; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : interactions; galaxies : ISM; galaxies : kinematics and dynamics; infrared : galaxies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Luminous and ultraluminous infrared galaxies (LIRGs and ULIRGs) dominate the star formation rate budget of the universe at z greater than or similar to 1, yet no local measurements of their heavy-element abundances exist. We measure nuclear or near-nuclear oxygen abundances in a sample of 100 star-forming LIRGs and ULIRGs using new, previously published, and archival spectroscopy of strong emission lines (including [O II] lambda lambda 3726, 3729) in galaxies with redshifts < z > similar to 0.1. When compared to local emission-line galaxies of similar luminosity and mass (using the near-infrared luminosity-metallicity and mass-metallicity relations), we find that LIRGs and ULIRGs are underabundant by a factor of 2 on average. As a corollary, LIRGs and ULIRGs also have smaller effective yields. We conclude that the observed under-abundance results from the combination of a decrease of abundance with increasing radius in the progenitor galaxies and strong, interaction- or merger-induced gas inflow into the galaxy nucleus. This conclusion demonstrates that local abundance scaling relations are not universal, a fact that must be accounted for when interpreting abundances earlier in the universe's history, when merger-induced star formation was the dominant mode. We use our local sample to compare to high-redshift samples and assess abundance evolution in LIRGs and ULIRGs. We find that abundances in these systems increased by similar to 0.2 dex from z similar to 0.6 to z similar to 0.1. Evolution from z similar to 2 submillimeter galaxies to z similar to 0.1ULIRGs also appears to be present, although uncertainty due to spectroscopic limitations is large.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available