4.7 Article

The delay-time distribution of type Ia supernovae and the single-degenerate model

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 683, Issue 2, Pages L127-L130

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/591646

Keywords

binaries : close; galaxies : evolution; stars : winds, outflows; supernovae : general

Funding

  1. World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI Initiative)
  2. MEXT, Japan [19047004, 20040004]
  3. Scientific Research of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [18104003, 18540231, 20540226, 20540227]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20040004] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a theoretical delay-time distribution (DTD) of Type Ia supernovae on the basis of our new evolutionary models of single- degenerate (SD) progenitor systems. Our model DTD has almost a featureless power law shape (infinity t(-n) with n approximate to 1) for the delay time from t similar to 0.1 to 10 Gyr. This is in good agreement with the recent direct measurement of DTDs. The observed featureless property of the DTD has been suggested to be favorable for the double-degenerate (DD) scenario but not for the SD scenario. If the mass range of the companion star to the white dwarf (WD) were too narrow in the SD model, its DTD would be too limited around the companion's main-sequence lifetime to be consistent with the observed DTD. However, this is not the case in our SD model that consists of the two channels of WD + RG (red giant) and WD + MS (main-sequence star). In these channels, the companion stars have a mass range of similar to 0.9-3 M-circle dot (WD + RG) and similar to 2-6 M-circle dot (WD+MS). The combined mass range is wide enough to yield the featureless DTD. We emphasize that the SD scenario should include two important processes: the optically thick winds from the mass-accreting WD and the mass-stripping from the companion star by the WD wind.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available