4.4 Article

Drought and Pluvial Dipole Events within the Great Plains of the United States

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY
Volume 54, Issue 9, Pages 1886-1898

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JAMC-D-15-0002.1

Keywords

Drought; Precipitation; Interannual variability

Funding

  1. NOAA Climate Program Office's Sectoral Applications Research Program (SARP) Grant [NA130AR4310122]
  2. Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2012-02355]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to quantify dipole events (a drought year followed by a pluvial year) for various spatial scales including the nine Oklahoma climate divisions and the author-defined regions of the U.S. Southern Great Plains (SGP), High Plains (HP), and Northern Great Plains (NGP). Analyses revealed that, on average, over twice as many standard deviation (STDEV) dipoles existed in the latter half of the dataset (1955-2013) relative to the first half (1896-1954), suggesting that dramatic increases in precipitation from one year to the next within the Oklahoma climate divisions are increasing with time. For the larger regions within the Great Plains of the United States, the percent chance of a significant pluvial year following a significant drought year was approximately 25% of the time for the SGP and NGP and approximately 16% of the time for the HP. The STDEV dipole analyses further revealed that the frequency of dipoles was consistent between the first and second half of the dataset for the NGP and HP but was increasing with time in the SGP. The temporal periods of anomalous precipitation during relative pluvial years within the STDEV dipole events were unique for each region whereby October occurred most frequently (70%) within the SGP, September occurred most frequently (60%) within the HP, and May occurred most frequently (62%) within the NGP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available