4.7 Article

MERGERS AND MASS ACCRETION RATES IN GALAXY ASSEMBLY: THE MILLENNIUM SIMULATION COMPARED TO OBSERVATIONS OF z ≈ 2 GALAXIES

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 688, Issue 2, Pages 789-793

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/592241

Keywords

dark matter; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: high-redshift

Funding

  1. International Max Planck Research School in Astrophysics
  2. Marie Curie Host Fellowship
  3. Early Stage Research Training

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent observations of UV/optically selected, massive star-forming galaxies at z approximate to 2 indicate that the baryonic mass assembly and star formation history is dominated by continuous rapid accretion of gas and internal secular evolution, rather than by major mergers. We use the Millennium Simulation to build new halo merger trees and extract halo merger fractions and mass accretion rates. We find that, even for halos not undergoing major mergers, the mass accretion rates are plausibly sufficient to account for the high star formation rates observed in z approximate to 2 disks. On the other hand, the fraction of major mergers in the Millennium Simulation is sufficient to account for the number counts of submillimeter galaxies (SMGs), in support of observational evidence that these are major mergers. When following the fate of these two populations in the Millennium Simulation to z = 0, we find that subsequent mergers are not frequent enough to convert all z approximate to 2 turbulent disks into elliptical galaxies at z = 0. Similarly, mergers cannot transform the compact SMGs/red sequence galaxies at z approximate to 2 into observed massive cluster ellipticals at z = 0. We argue therefore, that secular and internal evolution must play an important role in the evolution of a significant fraction of z approximate to 2 UV/optically and submillimeter-selected galaxy populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available