4.7 Article

Constraints on first-light ionizing sources from optical depth of the cosmic microwave background

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 685, Issue 1, Pages 1-7

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/590898

Keywords

cosmic microwave background; cosmology : theory; intergalactic medium

Funding

  1. NASA [NNX07-AG77G]
  2. NSF [AST 07-07474]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examine the constraints on high-redshift star formation, ultraviolet and X-ray preionization, and the epoch of reionization at redshift z(r), inferred from the recent WMAP-5 measurement, tau(e) = 0.084 +/- 0.016, of the electron-scattering optical depth of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). Half of this scattering can be accounted for by the optical depth, tau(e) = 0.04-0.05, of a fully ionized intergalactic medium (IGM) at z <= z(GP) approximate to 6-7, consistent with Gunn-Peterson absorption in neutral hydrogen. The required additional optical depth, Delta tau(e) = 0.03 +/- 0.02 at z > z(GP), constrains the ionizing contributions of first light'' sources. WMAP-5 also measured a significant increase in small-scale power, which lowers the required efficiency of star formation and ionization from minihalos. Early massive stars (UV radiation) and black holes (X-rays) can produce a partially ionized IGM, adding to the residual electrons left from incomplete recombination. Inaccuracies in computing the ionization history, x(e)(z), and degeneracies in cosmological parameters (Omega(m), Omega(b), sigma(8), n(s)) add systematic uncertainty to the measurement and modeling of tau(e). From the additional optical depth from sources at z > z(GP), we limit the star formation efficiency, the rate of ionizing photon production for Population III and Population II stars, and the photon escape fraction, using standard histories of baryon collapse, minihalo star formation, and black hole X-ray preionization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available