4.7 Article

Quantitative assessment of the SR Ca2+ leak-load relationship

Journal

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
Volume 91, Issue 7, Pages 594-600

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.RES.0000036914.12686.28

Keywords

Ca2+ cycling; membrane transport; sarcoplasmic reticulum; ryanodine receptors; excitation-contraction coupling

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL64098] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increased diastolic SR Ca2+ leak (J(leak)) could depress contractility in heart failure, but there are conflicting reports regarding the J(leak) magnitude even in normal, intact myocytes. We have developed a novel approach to measure SR Ca2+ leak in intact, isolated ventricular myocytes. After stimulation, myocytes were exposed to 0 Na+, 0 Ca2+ solution +/-1 mmol/L tetracaine (to block resting leak). Total cell [Ca2+] does not change under these conditions with Na+-Ca2+ exchange inhibited. Resting [Ca2+](i) declined 25% after tetracaine addition (126 +/- 6 versus 94 +/- 6 nmol/L; P<0.05). At the same time, SR [Ca2+] ([Ca2+](SRT)) increased 20% (93 +/- 8 versus 108 +/- 6 μmol/L). From this Ca2+ shift, we calculate J(leak) to be 12 μmol/L per second or 30% of the SR diastolic efflux. The remaining 70% is SR pump unidirectional reverse flux (backflux). The sum of these Ca2+ effluxes is counterbalanced by unidirectional forward Ca2+ pump flux. J(leak) also increased nonlinearly with [Ca2+](SRT) with a steeper increase at higher load. We conclude that J(leak) is 4 to 15 μmol/L cytosol per second at physiological [Ca2+](SRT). The data suggest that the leak is steeply [Ca2+](SRT)-dependent, perhaps because of increased [Ca2+](i) sensitivity of the ryanodine receptor at higher [Ca2+](SRT). Key factors that determine [Ca2+](SRT) in intact ventricular myocytes include (1) the thermodynamically limited Ca2+ gradient that the SR can develop (which depends on forward flux and backflux through the SR Ca2+ ATPase) and (2) diastolic SR Ca2+ leak (ryanodine receptor mediated).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available