4.7 Article

Observations of disks around brown dwarfs in the TW hydra association with the spitzer infrared spectrograph

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 676, Issue 2, Pages L143-L146

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/587462

Keywords

accretion; accretion disks; planetary systems : protoplanetary disks; stars : formation; stars : low-mass; brown dwarfs; stars : pre-main-sequence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using SpeX at the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility and the Spitzer Infrared Spectrograph, we have obtained infrared spectra from 0.7 to 40 mu m for three young brown dwarfs in the TW Hydra association (tau similar to Myr), 2MASSW J1207334 - 393254, 2MASSW J1139511 - 315921, and SSSPM J1102 - 3431. The spectral energy distribution for 2MASSW J1139511 - 315921 is consistent with a stellar photosphere for the entire wavelength range of our data, whereas the other two objects exhibit significant excess emission at mm. We are able to reproduce the excess emission from each brown dwarf using our models of irradiated accretion disks. According to our model fits, both disks have experienced a high degree of dust settling. We also find that silicate emission at 10 and 20 mm is absent from the spectra of these disks, indicating that grains in the upper disk layers have grown to sizes larger than similar to 5 mu m. Both of these characteristics are consistent with previous observations of decreasing silicate emission with lower stellar masses and older ages. These trends suggest that either ( 1) the growth of dust grains, and perhaps planetesimal formation, occurs faster in disks around brown dwarfs than in disks around stars or ( 2) the radii of the mid-IR-emitting regions of disks are smaller for brown dwarfs than for stars, and grains grow faster at smaller disk radii. Finally, we note the possible detection of an unexplained emission feature near 14 mm in the spectra of both of the disk-bearing brown dwarfs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available