4.7 Article

CD103 expression is required for destruction of pancreatic islet allografts by CD8+ T cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
Volume 196, Issue 7, Pages 877-886

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20020178

Keywords

integrins; cytolytic T lymphocytes; epithelial cells; transplantation; graft infiltrating lymphocytes

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R21 AI036532, R01 AI036532, R56 AI036532, AI36532] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mechanisms by which CD8 effector populations interact with epithelial layers is a poorly defined aspect of adaptive immunity. Recognition that CD8 effectors have the capacity to express CD103, an integrin directed to the epithelial cell-specific ligand E-cadherin, potentially provides insight into such interactions. To assess the role of CD 103 in promoting CD8-mediated destruction of epithelial layers, we herein examined the capacity of mice with targeted disruption of CD103 to reject pancreatic islet allografts. Wild-type hosts uniformly rejected islet allografts, concomitant with the appearance of CD8(+)CD103(+) effectors at the graft site. In contrast, the majority of islet allografts transplanted into CD103(-/-) hosts survived indefinitely. Transfer of wild-type CD8 cells into CD103(-/-) hosts elicited prompt rejection of long-surviving islet allografts, whereas CD103(-/-) CD8 cells were completely ineffectual, demonstrating that the defect resides at the level of the CD8 cell. CD8 cells in CD103(-/-) hosts exhibited normal effector responses to donor alloantigens in vitro and trafficked normally to the graft site, but strikingly failed to infiltrate the islet allograft itself. These data establish a causal relationship between CD8(+)CD103(+) effectors and destruction of graft epithelial elements and suggest that CD103 critically functions to promote intragraft migration of CD8 effectors into epithelial compartments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available