4.6 Article

Raman spectra of high-density, low-density, and linear low-density polyethylene pellets and prediction of their physical properties by multivariate data analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
Volume 86, Issue 2, Pages 443-448

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/app.10999

Keywords

polyethylene; Raman spectroscopy; principal component analysis (PCA); partial least-squares (PLS) regression

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Raman spectra have been measured for pellets of five samples of high-density polyethylene (HDPE), seven samples of low-density polyethylene (LDPE), and six samples of linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE). The obtained Raman spectra have been compared to find out characteristic Raman bands of HDPE, LDPE, and LLDPE. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to the Raman spectra in the 1600-650 cm(-1) region after multiplicative scatter correction (MSC) to discriminate the Raman spectra of the three different PE species. They are classified into three groups by a score plot of PCA factor 1 vs. 2. HDPE with high density and high crystallinity gives high scores on the factor I axis, while LDPE with low density and low crystallinity yields negative scores on the same axis. It seems that factor I reflects the density or crystallinity. A PC weight loadings plot for factor I shows six upward peaks corresponding to the bands arising from the crystalline parts or all-trans -(CH2)(n)- groups and seven downward peaks ascribed to the bands of the amorphous or anisotropic regions and those arising from the short branches. Partial least-squares (PLS-1) regression was applied to the Raman spectra after MSC to propose calibration models that predict the density, crystallinity, and melting points of the polyethylenes. The correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.9941, 0.9800, and 0.9709 for the density, crystallinity, and melting point, respectively, and their root-mean-square error of cross validation (RMSECV) was found to be 0.0015, 3.3707, and 2.3745, respectively. The loadings plot of factor 2 for the prediction of melting point is largely different from those for the prediction of density and crystallinity. (C) 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available