4.7 Article

Kinematics of diffuse ionized gas halos: A ballistic model of halo rotation

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 578, Issue 1, Pages 98-108

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/342309

Keywords

galaxies : evolution; galaxies : individual (NGC 891, NGC 5775); gravitation; ISM : kinematics and dynamics; stellar dynamics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To better understand diffuse ionized gas (DIG) kinematics and halo rotation in spiral galaxies, we have developed a model in which clouds are ejected from the disk and follow ballistic trajectories through the halo. The behavior of clouds in this model has been investigated thoroughly through a parameter space search and a study of individual cloud orbits. Synthetic velocity profiles have been generated in z (height above the plane) from the models for the purpose of comparing with velocity centroid data from previously obtained long-slit spectra of the edge-on spirals NGC 891 (one slit) and NGC 5775 (two slits). In each case, a purely ballistic model is insufficient to explain observed DIG kinematics. In the case of NGC 891, the observed vertical velocity gradient is not as steep as predicted by the model, possibly suggesting a source of coupling between disk and halo rotation or an outwardly directed pressure gradient. The ballistic model more successfully explains DIG kinematics observed in NGC 5775; however, it cannot explain the observed trend of high-z gas velocities nearly reaching the systemic velocity. Such behavior can be attributed to either an inwardly directed pressure gradient or a possible tidal interaction with its companion, NGC 5774. In addition, the ballistic model predicts that clouds move radially outward as they cycle through the halo. The mass and energy fluxes estimated from the model suggest that this radially outward gas migration leads to a redistribution of material that may significantly affect the evolution of the interstellar medium.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available