4.7 Article

THE RECENT STAR FORMATION HISTORIES OF M81 GROUP DWARF IRREGULAR GALAXIES

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 689, Issue 1, Pages 160-183

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/592323

Keywords

galaxies: dwarf; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: stellar content

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present observations and analysis of nine dwarf irregular galaxies (dIs) in the M81 Group taken with the Advanced Camera for Surveys aboard the Hubble Space Telescope. The nine galaxies (the Garland, M81 Dwarf A, DDO 53, Ho IX, Ho I, DDO 165, NGC 2366, Ho II, and IC 2574) span 6 mag in luminosity, a factor of 1000 in current star formation rate, and 0.5 dex in metallicity. We use color-magnitude diagrams of resolved stellar populations to study the star formation histories (SFHs) of these galaxies. Dividing the sample at M-B = -15, we analyze the similarities and differences in the SFHs, birthrate parameters (b), fraction of stars formed per time interval (f), and spatial distribution of stellar components. As function of luminosity, we find only minor differences in SF characteristics among the M81 Group dIs despite a wide range of physical properties. We extend our comparison to select dIs in the Local Group (LG) and, again, find little variation in SF parameters. Our average f parameters are consistent with a constant SFH; however, individual galaxies can show significant departures from this. We find this result underlines the importance of stochastic SF in dIs. We also compare possible formation scenarios of the fainter and candidate tidal dwarfs (TDGs) in the M81 Group. The SFHs and the spatial distribution of associated red stars suggest that the Garland and Ho IX are not dIs and are potentially TDGs. A noteworthy difference between the LG and the M81 Group is the lack of TDGs in the LG.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available