4.7 Article

A SEARCH FOR COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND ANISOTROPIES ON ARCMINUTE SCALES WITH BOLOCAM

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 690, Issue 2, Pages 1597-1620

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/690/2/1597

Keywords

cosmic microwave background; cosmological parameters; cosmology: observations; methods: data analysis; large-scale structure of universe

Funding

  1. STFC [ST/G002711/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have surveyed two science fields totaling 1 deg(2) with Bolocam at 2.1 mm to search for secondary Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) anisotropies caused by the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect (SZE). The fields are in the Lynx and Subaru/XMM SDS1 fields. Our survey is sensitive to angular scales with an effective angular multipole of l(eff) = 5700 with FWHMl = 2800 and has an angular resolution of 60 arcsec FWHM. Our data provide no evidence for anisotropy. We are able to constrain the level of total astronomical anisotropy, modeled as a flat-band power in C-l, with most frequent 68%, 90%, and 95% CL upper limits of 590, 760, and 830 mu K-CMB(2). We statistically subtract the known contribution from primary CMB anisotropy, including cosmic variance, to obtain constraints on the SZE anisotropy contribution. Now including flux calibration uncertainty, our most frequent 68%, 90%, and 95% CL upper limits on a flat-band power in C-l are 690, 960, and 1000 mu K-CMB(2). When we instead employ the analytical spectrum suggested by Komatsu and Seljack in 2002, and account for the non-Gaussianity of the SZE anisotropy signal, we obtain upper limits on the average amplitude of their spectrum weighted by our transfer function of 790, 1060, and 1080 mu K-CMB(2). We obtain a 90% CL upper limit on sigma(8), which normalizes the power spectrum of density fluctuations, of 1.57. These are the first constraints on anisotropy and sigma(8) from survey data at these angular scales at frequencies near 150 GHz.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available