4.7 Article

DEEP L′-AND M-BAND IMAGING FOR PLANETS AROUND VEGA AND ε ERIDANI

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 688, Issue 1, Pages 583-596

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/592100

Keywords

instrumentation: adaptive optics; planetary systems; stars: individual (Vega, epsilon Eridani); techniques: image processing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have obtained deep adaptive optics (AO) images of Vega and epsilon Eri to search for planetary mass companions. We observed at the MMT in the L ' (3.8 mu m) and M (4.8 mu m) bands using Clio, a recently commissioned imager optimized for these wavelengths. Observing at these long wavelengths represents a departure from the H band (1.65 mu m) more commonly used for AO imaging searches for extrasolar planets. The long wavelengths offer better predicted planet/star flux ratios and cleaner (higher Strehl) AO images at the cost of lower diffraction-limited resolution and higher sky background. We have not detected any planets or planet candidates around Vega or epsilon Eri. We report the sensitivities obtained around both stars, which correspond to upper limits on any planetary companions which may exist. The sensitivities of our L '- and M-band observations are comparable to those of the best H-regime observations of these stars. For epsilon Eri, our M-band observations deliver considerably better sensitivity to close-in planets than any previously published results, and we show that the M band is by far the best wavelength choice for attempts at ground-based AO imaging of the known planet epsilon Eri b. The Clio camera itself, with MMTAO, may be capable of detecting epsilon Eri b at its 2010 apastron, given a multinight observing campaign. Clio appears to be the only currently existing AO imager that has a realistic possibility of detecting epsilon Eri b.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available