4.7 Article

Inhibition of tobacco smoke-induced lung inflammation by a catalytic antioxidant

Journal

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 33, Issue 8, Pages 1106-1114

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0891-5849(02)01003-1

Keywords

tobacco smoke; inflammation; squamous cell metaplasia; catalytic antioxidant; Metalloporphyrins; AEOL 10150; free radicals

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR00169] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01 HL31992] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES05707] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cigarette smokers experience airway inflammation and epithelial damage, the mechanisms of which are unknown. One potential cause may be free radicals either in tobacco smoke or produced during persistent inflammation. Inflammation may also be a driving force to cause airway epithelium to undergo changes leading to squamous cell metaplasia. To test whether tobacco smoke-induced inflammation could be reduced by a catalytic antioxidant, manganese(III)meso-tetrakis(N,N'-diethyl-1,3-imidazolium-2-yl) porphyrin (AEOL 10150) was given by intratracheal instillation to rats exposed to filtered air or tobacco smoke. Exposure to tobacco smoke for 2 d or 8 weeks (6 h/d, 3 d/week) significantly increased the number of cells recovered by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). AEOL 10150 significantly decreased BAL cell number in tobacco smoke-treated rats. Significant reductions in neutrophils were noted at 2 d and macrophages at 8 weeks. Lymphocytes were significantly reduced by AEOL 10150 at both time points. Squamous cell metaplasia following 8 weeks of tobacco smoke exposure was 12% of the total airway epithelial area in animals exposed to tobacco smoke without AEOL 10150, compared with 2% in animals exposed to tobacco smoke, but treated with AEOL 10150 (p < .05). We conclude that a synthetic catalytic antioxidant decreased the adverse effects of exposure to tobacco smoke. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available