4.7 Article

Are optically selected quasars universally X-ray luminous? X-ray-UV relations in Sloan Digital Sky Survey quasars

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 685, Issue 2, Pages 773-786

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/590403

Keywords

galaxies : active; galaxies : nuclei; quasars : absorption lines; quasars : emission lines; X-rays : general

Funding

  1. NASA LTSA [NAG5-13035]
  2. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  3. Participating Institutions
  4. National Science Foundation
  5. Department of Energy
  6. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  7. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  8. Max Planck Society
  9. Higher Education Funding Council for England

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We analyze archived Chandra and XMM-Newton X-ray observations of 536 Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Data Release 5 (DR5) quasars (QSOs) at 1.7 <= z <= 2.7 in order to characterize the relative UV and X-ray spectral properties of QSOs that do not have broad UV absorption lines (BALs). We constrain the fraction of X-ray-weak, non-BAL QSOs and find that such objects are rare; for example, sources underluminous by a factor of 10 comprise less than or similar to 2% of optically selected SDSS QSOs. X-ray luminosities vary with respect to UV emission by a factor of less than or similar to 2 over several years for most sources. UV continuum reddening and the presence of narrow-line absorbing systems are not strongly associated with X-ray weakness in our sample. X-ray brightness is significantly correlated with UV emission-line properties, so that relatively X-ray-weak, non-BAL QSOs generally have weaker, blueshifted C IV lambda 1549 emission and broader C III] lambda 1909 lines. The C IV emission-line strength depends on both UV and X-ray luminosity, suggesting that the physical mechanism driving the global Baldwin effect is also associated with X-ray emission.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available