4.7 Article

Plasma foliate levels and risk of spontaneous abortion

Journal

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 288, Issue 15, Pages 1867-1873

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.15.1867

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context Both folate deficiency and folic acid supplements have been reported to increase the risk of spontaneous abortion. The results are inconclusive, however, and measurements of folate have not been available in all studies. Objective To study the association between plasma folate levels and the risk of spontaneous abortion. Design, Setting, and Population Population-based, matched, case-control study of case women with spontaneous abortion and control women from January 1996 through December 1998 in Uppsala County, Sweden. Plasma folate measurements were available for 468 cases and 921 controls at 6 to 12 gestational weeks. Main Outcome Measure Risk of spontaneous abortion vs maternal plasma folate level. Results Compared with women with plasma folate levels between 2.20 and 3.95 ng/mL (5.0 and 8.9 nmol/L), women with low (less than or equal to2.19 ng/mL [less than or equal to 4.9 nmol/L]) folate levels were at increased risk of spontaneous abortion (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-2.14), whereas women with higher folate levels (3.96-6.16 ng/mL [9.0-13.9 nmol/L] and greater than or equal to6.17 ng/mL [greater than or equal to14.0 nmol/L]) showed no increased risk of spontaneous abortion (OR, 0.84; 95% Cl, 0.59-1.20; and OR, 0.74; 95% Cl, 0.47-1.16, respectively). Low folate levels were associated with a significantly increased risk when the fetal karyotype was abnormal (OR, 1.95; 95% Cl, 1.09-3.48) but not when the fetal karyotype was normal (OR, 1.11; 95% Cl, 0.55-2.24) or unknown (OR, 1.45; 95% Cl, 0.90-2.33). Conclusion Low plasma folate levels were associated with an increased risk of early spontaneous abortion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available