4.8 Article

Paracrine cyclooxygenase-2-mediated signalling by macrophages promotes tumorigenic progression of intestinal epithelial cells

Journal

ONCOGENE
Volume 21, Issue 47, Pages 7175-7186

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205869

Keywords

adenomatous polyps; colorectal cancer; cyclooxygenase; macrophage

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In human colorectal adenomas or polyps, cyclooxygenase-2 is expressed predominantly by stromal (or interstitial) macrophages. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that macrophage cyclooxygenase-2 has paracrine pro-tumorigenic activity using in vitro models of macrophage-epithelial cell interactions. We report that macrophages can promote tumorigenic progression of intestinal epithelial cells (evidenced by decreased cell-cell contact inhibition, increased proliferation and apoptosis, gain of anchorage-independent growth capability, decreased membranous E-cadherin expression, up-regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 expression, down-regulation of transforming growth factor-beta type 11 receptor expression and resistance to the antiproliferative activity of transforming growth factor-beta(1)) in a paracrine, cyclooxygenase-2-dependent manner. Pharmacologically relevant concentrations (1-2 muM) of a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor had no detectable, direct effect on intestinal epithelial cells but inhibited the macrophage-epithelial cell signal mediating tumorigenic progression. Cyclooxygenase-2-mediated stromal-epithelial cell signalling during the early stages of intestinal tumorigenesis provides a novel target for chemoprevention of colorectal cancer (and other gastro-intestinal epithelial malignancies, which arise on a background of chronic inflammation, such as gastric cancer) and may explain the discrepancy between the concentrations of cyclooxygenase inhibitors required to produce antineoplastic effects in vitro and in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available