4.7 Article

SENSITIVITY OF PDR CALCULATIONS TO MICROPHYSICAL DETAILS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 686, Issue 2, Pages 1125-1136

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/591505

Keywords

dust extinction; infrared: ISM; ISM: lines and bands; ISM: molecules; ISM: structure; submillimeter

Funding

  1. University of Kentucky Supercomputing Center
  2. Miami University (Ohio) Redhawk Computer Cluster
  3. National Science Foundation [0094050, 0607497, AST 0607028]
  4. Belgian Science Policy Office [MO/33/017]
  5. NASA [NNG05GD81G]
  6. STScI [HST-AR-10951]
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  8. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [0607497] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  10. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0094050] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our understanding of physical processes in photodissociation regions or photon-dominated regions (PDRs) largely depends on the ability of spectral synthesis codes to reproduce the observed infrared emission-line spectrum. In this paper, we explore the sensitivity of a single PDR model to microphysical details. Our calculations use the Cloudy spectral synthesis code, recently modified to include a wealth of PDR physical processes. We show how the chemical/thermal structure of a PDR, along with the calculated spectrum, changes when the treatment of physical processes such as grain physics and atomic/molecular rates are varied. We find a significant variation in the intensities of PDR emission lines, depending on different treatments of the grain physics. We also show how different combinations of the cosmic-ray ionization rate, inclusion of grain-atom/ion charge transfer, and the grain size distribution can lead to very similar results for the chemical structure. In addition, our results show the utility of Cloudy for the spectral modeling of molecular environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available