4.6 Article

Brain genomic response following hypoxia and re-oxygenation in the neonatal rat - Identification of genes that might contribute to hypoxia-induced ischemic tolerance

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 277, Issue 42, Pages 39728-39738

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M204619200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG19561] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS38743, NS28167, NS42774, NS43252] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hypoxic preconditioning (8% O-2, 3 h) produces tolerance 24 h after hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in neonatal rats. To better understand the ischemic tolerance mechanisms induced by hypoxia, we used oligonucleotide microarrays to examine genomic responses in neonatal rat brain following 3 h of hypoxia (8% O-2) and either 0, 6, 18, or 24 h of re-oxygenation. The results showed that hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1- but not HIF-2-mediated gene expression may be involved in brain hypoxia-induced tolerance. Among the genes regulated by hypoxia, 12 genes were confirmed by real time reverse transcriptase-PCR as follows: VEGF, EPO, GLUT-1, adrenomedullin, propyl 4-hydroxylase alpha, MT-1, MKP-1, CELF, 12-lipoxygenase, t-PA, CAR-1, and an expressed sequence tag. Some genes, for example GLUT-1, MT-1, CELF, MKP-1, and t-PA did not show any hypoxic regulation in either astrocytes or neurons, suggesting that other cells are responsible for the up-regulation of these genes in the hypoxic brain. These genes were expressed in normal and hypoxic brain, heart, kidney, liver, and lung, with adrenomedullin, MT-1, and VEGF being prominently induced in brain by hypoxia. These results suggest that a number of endogenous molecular mechanisms may explain how hypoxic preconditioning protects against subsequent ischemia, and may provide novel therapeutic targets for treatment of cerebral ischemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available