4.7 Article

Implications of two type Ia supernova populations for cosmological measurements

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 684, Issue 1, Pages L13-L16

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/592019

Keywords

cosmological parameters; cosmology : observations; supernovae : general; surveys

Funding

  1. IGPP [Astro-1603-07]
  2. NSF [CAREER AST0645427]
  3. McCue

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent work suggests that Type Ia supernovae (SNe) are composed of two distinct populations: prompt and delayed. By explicitly incorporating properties of host galaxies, it may be possible to target and eliminate systematic differences between these two putative populations. However, any resulting post-calibration shift in luminosity between the components will cause a redshift-dependent systematic shift in the Hubble diagram. Utilizing an existing sample of 192 SNe Ia, we find that the average luminosity difference between prompt and delayed SNe is constrained to be (4.5 +/- 8.9)%. If the absolute difference between the two populations is 0.025 mag, and this is ignored when fitting for cosmological parameters, then the dark energy equation of state (EOS) determined from a sample of 2300 SNe Ia is biased at similar to 1 sigma. By incorporating the possibility of a two-population systematic, this bias can be eliminated. However, assuming no prior on the strength of the two-population effect, the uncertainty in the best-fit EOS is increased by a factor of 2.5, when compared to the equivalent sample with no underlying two-population systematic. To avoid introducing a bias in the EOS parameters, or significantly degrading the measurement accuracy, it is necessary to control the postcalibration luminosity difference between prompt and delayed SN populations to better than 0.025 mag.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available