4.7 Article

Stellar populations in early-type Coma cluster galaxies - I. The data

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 336, Issue 2, Pages 382-408

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05742.x

Keywords

catalogues; galaxies : clusters : individual : Coma (A1656); galaxies : elliptical and lenticular, cD; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : kinematics and dynamics; galaxies : stellar content

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a homogeneous and high signal-to-noise ratio data set (mean S/N ratio of similar to60 Angstrom(-1)) of Lick/IDS stellar population line indices and central velocity dispersions for a sample of 132 bright (b(j) less than or equal to 18.0) galaxies within the central 1degrees(equivalent to1.26 h (-1) Mpc) of the nearby rich Coma cluster (A1656). Our observations include 73 per cent (100 out of 137) of the total early-type galaxy population (b(j) less than or equal to 18.0). Observations were made with the William Herschel 4.2-m telescope and the AUTOFIB2/WYFFOS multi-object spectroscopy instrument (resolution of similar to2.2-Angstrom FWHM) using 2.7-arcsec diameter fibres (equivalent to0.94h (-1) kpc). The data in this paper have well-characterized errors, calculated in a rigorous and statistical way. Data are compared with previous studies and are demonstrated to be of high quality and well calibrated on to the Lick/IDS system. Our data have median errors of similar to0.1 Angstrom for atomic line indices, similar to0.008 mag for molecular line indices and 0.015 dex for velocity dispersions. This work provides a well-defined, high-quality baseline at zsimilar to 0 for studies of medium- to high-redshift clusters. Subsequent papers will use this data set to probe the stellar populations (which act as fossil records of galaxy formation and evolution) and the spectrophotometric relations of the bright early-type galaxies within the core of the Coma cluster.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available