4.7 Article

Lensperfect:: Gravitational lens mass map reconstructions yielding exact reproduction of all multiple images

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 681, Issue 2, Pages 814-830

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1086/588250

Keywords

dark matter; galaxies : clusters : general; gravitational lensing; methods : data analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a new approach to gravitational lens mass map reconstruction. Our mass map solutions perfectly reproduce the positions, fluxes, and shears of all multiple images, and each mass map accurately recovers the under-lying mass distribution to a resolution limited by the number of multiple images detected. We demonstrate our technique given a mock galaxy cluster similar to Abell 1689, which gravitationally lenses 19 mock background galaxies to produce 93 multiple images. We also explore cases in which as few as four multiple images are observed. Mass map solutions are never unique, and our method makes it possible to explore an extremely flexible range of physical ( and unphysical) solutions, all of which perfectly reproduce the data given. Each reconfiguration of the source galaxies produces a new mass map solution. An optimization routine is provided to find those source positions ( and redshifts, within uncertainties) that produce the most physical'' mass map solution, according to a new figure of merit developed here. Our method imposes no assumptions about the slope of the radial profile or mass following light. However, unlike nonparametric'' grid-based methods, the number of free parameters that we solve for is only as many as the number of observable constraints ( or slightly greater if fluxes are constrained). For each set of source positions and redshifts, mass map solutions are obtained instantly'' via direct matrix inversion by smoothly interpolating the deflection field using a recently developed mathematical technique. Our LensPerfect software is straightforward and easy to use, and is publicly available on our Web site.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available