4.7 Article

The structure of the DoAr 25 circumstellar disk

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 678, Issue 2, Pages L133-L136

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/588730

Keywords

circumstellar matter; planetary systems : protoplanetary disks; stars : formation; stars : individual (DoAr 25); stars : pre-main-sequence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present high spatial resolution (<= 0.3'' approximate to 40 AU) Submillimeter Array observations of the 865 mm continuum emission from the circumstellar disk around the young star DoAr 25. Despite its bright millimeter emission, this source exhibits only a comparatively small infrared excess and low accretion rate, suggesting that the material and structural properties of the inner disk may be in an advanced state of evolution. A simple model of the physical conditions in the disk is derived from the submillimeter visibilities and the complete spectral energy distribution using a Monte Carlo radiative transfer code. For the standard assumption of a homogeneous grain size distribution at all disk radii, the results indicate a shallow surface density profile, Sigma proportional to r(-p) with p approximate to 0.34, significantly less steep than a steady-state accretion disk (p = 1) or the often adopted minimum mass solar nebula (p = 1.5). Even though the total mass of material is large (M-d approximate to 0.10 M-circle dot), the densities inferred in the inner disk for such a model may be too low to facilitate any mode of planet formation. However, alternative models with steeper density gradients (p approximate to 1) can explain the observations equally well if substantial grain growth in the planet formation region (r <= 40 AU) has occurred. We discuss these data in the context of such models with dust properties that vary with radius and highlight their implications for understanding disk evolution and the early stages of planet formation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available