4.2 Article

Limiting superluminal electron and neutrino velocities using the 2010 Crab Nebula flare and the IceCube PeV neutrino events

Journal

ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS
Volume 56, Issue -, Pages 16-18

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2014.02.007

Keywords

Lorentz invariance; Neutrino; Electron

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The observation of two PeV-scale neutrino events reported by Ice Cube allows one to place constraints on Lorentz invariance violation (LIV) in the neutrino sector. After first arguing that at least one of the PeV IceCube events was of extragalactic origin, I derive an upper limit for the difference between putative superluminal neutrino and electron velocities of <=similar to 5.6 x 10(-19) in units where c = 1, confirming that the observed PeV neutrinos could have reached Earth from extragalactic sources. I further derive a new constraint on the superluminal electron velocity, obtained from the observation of synchrotron radiation from the Crab Nebula flare of September, 2010. The inference that the >1 GeV gamma-rays from synchrotron emission in the flare were produced by electrons of energy up to similar to 5.1 PeV indicates the non-occurrence of vacuum Cerenkov radiation by these electrons. This implies a new, strong constraint on superluminal electron velocities delta(e) <=similar to 5 x 10(-21). It immediately follows that one then obtains an upper limit on the superluminal neutrino velocity alone of delta(v) <= similar to 5.6 x 10(-19), many orders of magnitude better than the time-of-flight constraint from the SN1987A neutrino burst. However, if the electrons are sublurninal the constraint on |delta(e)| <=similar to 8 x 10(-17), obtained from the Crab Nebula gamma-ray spectrum, places a weaker constraint on superluminal neutrino velocity of delta(v) <=similar to 8 x 10(-17). Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available